<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.conrunner.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ConFusion_%28Eastercon%29</id>
		<title>ConFusion (Eastercon) - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conrunner.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ConFusion_%28Eastercon%29"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conrunner.net/wiki/index.php?title=ConFusion_(Eastercon)&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-12T16:02:10Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.conrunner.net/wiki/index.php?title=ConFusion_(Eastercon)&amp;diff=17230&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>John Bray: Created page with &quot;[https://fancyclopedia.org/Eastercon_2021 ConFusion], the 2021 Eastercon, lived up to its name. The very ambitious plan for the committee to be the first fannish users of a vi...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conrunner.net/wiki/index.php?title=ConFusion_(Eastercon)&amp;diff=17230&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-12-25T09:10:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;[https://fancyclopedia.org/Eastercon_2021 ConFusion], the 2021 Eastercon, lived up to its name. The very ambitious plan for the committee to be the first fannish users of a vi...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[https://fancyclopedia.org/Eastercon_2021 ConFusion], the 2021 Eastercon, lived up to its name. The very ambitious plan for the committee to be the first fannish users of a video-game like virtual convention system [[Gathertown]] failed because the software only worked on a limited range of platforms, provided a poor experience and had access issues. [[Discord]] was used for text chat well enough, but a complicated lashup of different systems for programme was confusing and unreliable, with almost no programme available for the first 2 days of the 4 day event. Committee relations with other staff areas were poor, and criticism not accepted. With the same committee bidding again site selection [[voting]] was acrimonious, and the curation of virtual questions unpopular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high hourly cost of Gathertown precluded much pre-con testing, and led to a £50 virtual membership which was viewed as expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The virtual [[Art Show]] using ????? was very well received.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{SeeAlso}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virtual]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>John Bray</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>